So all your tests should be rewritten using the async/await pattern. If you are already having an NX monorepo then this will be easy for you: You can add Nx to an existing Angular CLI project using: Or you can just generate a new workspace from scratch and copy your app over: Now, this should give us a new project, that can run Cypress with Angular CLI. Not a big deal, to be honest. But you can't get direct access to those elements from a test, as your browser is executed externally. So, the question is: Is it any tool or best practice for e2e testing in Vuejs? Built on Forem — the open source software that powers DEV and other inclusive communities. Protractor is overcomplicated When tests become fragile the team is not taking them seriously anymore and will soon have the tests disabled on the CI to merge pull requests. Comparing Protractor and Cypress? CodeceptJS provides you not only a tool to run browsers but best practice architecture to build sustainable end 2 end tests. It offers features such as time travel, dev tool debugging, live reloads, automatic waiting (no waits or sleeps in test code), as well as screenshots and videos of test runs. I'm just rising awareness of that problem. If I was you, in order to complete this article and make it more "credible", I would add at least a good alternative to it, and for alternative I mean something that has Tons of reasons to justify the migration from an official tool to one unofficial! In Protractor 5 promises were synchronized using control-flow mechanism. Why that's bad? As of today, webdriverio is the best webdriver implementation in JavaScript. Use the Nrwl Cypress builder to get ng e2e to run Cypress tests, instead of Protractor tests. This will make sure that your tests are working as stable as if a real user were testing. This means that once Protractor is upgraded to selenium-webdriver 4 it will drop it as well. Guess what, it still represents the most common Angular scenarios better than anything else I have seen, so I will still use that. Me neither! Tutorial; Protractor Setup . The test code itself is written using Jasmine . If that's the case and you have had to fight against the async hell , you will understand why the need of a new framework that improves that for us (among other stuff). Protractor exposes WebElements into tests. Congrats! – Mikki Oct 2 '17 at 14:20. add a comment | 3 Answers Active Oldest Votes. Protractor comes with all of the features of Capybara and essentially suffers from the same problems. One common problem for running the e2e tests on the CI pipeline is that it takes “too long” time to execute. I feel sad for people who took this article seriously, now the library is maintained by angular, it's being developed actively, await made the life much easier and cleaner, await removed the complexity of the framework, page object model is the slogan for any automation project. However, an alternative to Protractor is Cypress which is a tool that we have recently used. It was the most popular framework for single-page applications when there was no React or VueJS. With, ng e2e frontend-e2e --watch Cypress will start in the application mode. Protractor powers lots of tests out there. We strive for transparency and don't collect excess data. Protractor not driving a good design And if you still use it, or you consider using it because of its popularity - stop that. With Cypress, you can write E2E tests with a well-developed tooling. Selenium WebDriver is one of the pivotal components of … I recommend Cypress, with him is possible to do E2E and Unit tests. multiple windows and tabs: It's true that Cypress doesn't support multi tab and multi window but they have given reasons for not supporting that, which to me makes sense. There is an interesting post about the problem with Protractor on Christian Lüdemann’s blog. You can go ahead and write multiple scenarios for login and see your tests running. Then they bundled some sort of assertion library e.g. As others said, a major version introduces breaking changes, so it can be backwards compatible but it doesn't have to. Y ear 2020 has shown an upward trend in the usage of JS Automation frameworks such as Cypress, WebdriverIO, TestCafe, Nightwatch, Protractor, and Puppeteer and so on. Since Protractor is just a wrapper or a sort-off port of Selenium webdriver, so it can do whatever the Webdriver can do, like working with multiple windows, frames etc, which are not available in windows. Running this at noon and at midnight (against the dev environment reflecting the master branch) will give you fast enough feedback to respond to “red builds” than if you were only to run this on midnight or, urgh… manually. I hope you can find time to investigate more tools for testing so you could see Protractor is not the best at the market. Boilerplate to do e2e testing of vscode extension using Cypress and code-server. Protractor is maintained by Google and supports typescript Jasmine is a testing library the provides all the assertion and utility functions needed to write unit and E2E tests. I have seen that it can normally take around 10 minutes to build and serve the app before the e2e tests can be run. We don’t want our spec files to depend directly on the testing framework. If you like my posts, make sure to follow me on Twitter. Using Protractor provides a nice Promise-based interface on top of Selenium, which makes it less complicated to deal with asynchronous code. Of course, you can also create your own helpers for this as I have done in the past but then you need to maintain this as well. Made with love and Ruby on Rails. My final takeaway is this: if you can run your whole e2e suite in under 15 minutes, then just run it on every pull request check-in, as it is here automatic test verification provides the most value. How to start coding journey as non tech person? Many teams are comparing Protractor and Cypress for their E2E testing. The next problem of Protractor is the design which is highly inspired by Java and is very complicated for the JavaScript world. Wrapping hundreds of elements, calling commands on them, filtering them and mapping brings you out of the scope of testing. End to end (e2e) testing is where we test our entire application from the start to the end. Also, Cypress automatically will take and save a screenshot when it fails. Maintaining old code written in the days of Protractor and Angular glory can be more expensive than rewriting all tests from scratch! We can safely remove Protractor because it will be completely replaced. Check out waitForAngularthat does exactly that. Additionally, it automatically waits for elements to become visible, to become enabled, and to stop being covered. Protractor is a very popular end 2 end testing framework for NodeJS. Protractor was not actively developed as well for those years, and you may see outdated documentation or long-standing issues. Cypress does not need browser drivers like Selenium, because the code is executed directly as Javascript in the browser. Are there parts of the application that perhaps are tested too much? Since your tests are E2E the best tool for you is probably PractiTest - this tool has all End-to-End modules, from Requirements to test executions and bugs. However, it can be harder for developers in tests to switch to this new style if they are not familiar with it. These are one of those flaky tests that has plauged the testing community for so long. Using the flag --addCypressTestScripts two handy npm scripts were added to make the work with Cypress more comfortable. Instead, it delegates a browser control to other libraries, like webdriverio or Protractor. Here is the thing: when you have tried actually maintaining end-to-end test in real life and seen how much time they can take to maintain vs. the value they provide you would understand why focusing on just running top 5 use cases that you have a 100 % confidence in, will be the desired approach. Time to take these tests out of the test suite. Now we have that in place, let’s start building our first smoke test. Nx 7 introduces the option to use Cypress for running e2e tests instead of Protractor. Unlike, Protractor CodeceptJS do not expose web elements, its tests are written in a scenario-based manner, where all actions are explained from the eyes of a user: CodeceptJS do not control a browser by its own. Every product owner should by his job definition be able to answer that question. No need to worry. testing sites you don't control: Honestly, didn't get this point. Most of the apps we write at Gorrion use sophisticated, modern web stacks based on React and Angular. It was maintained by Google but not now. Most testing frameworks prior to Cypress were built with Selenium e.g. Have you ever seen Protractor fail and being confused from the error message why it failed? Cypress is a superb choice if you're only testing using Chrome. Cypress is the new standard in front-end testing that every developer and QA engineer needs. Protractor was not actively updated for a few years. Cypress is a self-proclaimed “developer-friendly” open-source end-to-end testing framework. Otherwise, run the full suite at noon and midnight. Using Protractor provides a nice Promise-based interface on top of Selenium, which makes it less complicated to deal with asynchronous code. With you every step of your journey. I will upload a video series with Cypress at a later point to show a more realistic setup with how to use Cypress with a system containing login and a database. Protractor is an E2E test runner that can take scenario tests and run them in the browser for us like in the video above. Unlike, Protractor webdriverio receive constant updates, it has a very active community of developers, and it just rocks! Now, we expand our test suite to the top 5 use cases. What does this mean? I normally recommend teams to start out with simple but stable end-to-end tests before making them more complicated as this will make them harder to maintain. So maybe webdriver.io could be an alternative but don't see anything better tgan protractor. This is quite a common picture of what Protractor tests can become. But Cypress is quite different technology for different tasks than Protractor. However, selenium-webdriver is dropping support of control flow in version 4. Step 1: Install Cypress. Currently, Protractor follows Java-style syntax, so engineers experienced with Java can easily go to Protractor. JavaScript is taking over the world. yarn add -D cypress @cypress/webpack-preprocessor @types/cypress ts-loader Protractor e2e tests are generated with each scaffolded Angular CLI project. They added accessors to angular models, bindings, ng-options – and finding elements inside ng-repeat. You don't mention how NodeJS is complicated under the hood, but why would you care if use don't need to know it to start using it, right? Nightwatchjs vs Protractor: What are the differences? Setting Up Protractor; Setting Up the Selenium Server 3) It is hard to trace errors when it fails. Yes! This is why we focus on the top 5 use cases. You don't understand what happens and you don't even want to look into this hell! Not fun I can tell you and you ideally want one for every command to have the complete traceability of your end-to-end tests when running it on the CI. The downside of this is that we are not testing against the real server which might be what we want. Yes, maybe. CodeceptJS takes a different approach in the end to end testing. Since Protractor is just a wrapper or a sort-off port of Selenium webdriver, so it can do whatever the Webdriver can do, like working with multiple windows, frames etc, which are not available in windows. Are there parts of the application still untested? When pages begin to transition, Cypress will pause command execution until the subsequent page is fully loaded. It has rich functionality including react selectors, shadow dom support, it can even use DevTools protocol for testing! Cypress.io vs Protractor: e2e testing battle; What Does Cypress Mean for the Future? Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) … Cypress : While I was busy with writing this blog post for different tools that use Selenium for end to end testing, cypress got my attention and I started to make a simple script by using Cypress. Experienced with the problems related to Selenium, we decided to switch our tactics and use Cypress as our primary E2E … We create a new file for the page object: Here we have a page object with a method for checking that each todo list item has the specified todo title. Suggestion: Learn about protractor-helper to create robust and flakiness free tests. Toggle navigation. Webdriverio is an alternative webdriver implementation not based on selenium-webdriver with elegant and more consistent API. Here is the part of angular.json where e2e tests are configured. I bet some of you might have wondered if I was just a talking suit! Create a seed endpoint to seed the test user BEFORE each test run. Because by ensuring the same initial conditions it is easier to maintain the tests. L’interface est plus agréable et user-friendly. If you plan to gradually move your site/app to Angular – you can start writing your Protractor E2E tests right now – and I will show you how. Another alternative would be to use CodeceptJS - a framework for supercharged end 2 end testing. Yes, sooner or later Protractor may be a bad choice, but why I disagree to the mentioned as of today: Don't get me wrong, the practice shows that those who don't make transition to newer technologies timely, lose their marketability. One architectural note with end-to-end tests. Doing this complicates the test runs, error tracking, stability, and maintenance when you need to support all these different paths. All of this is built into Cypress so each command and assertion will retry for the specified amount of time. Modern Single Page Applications are built around components and there is no single point of truth if a component has finished rendering or not. I came here from github.com/wswebcreation/protracto... As we are actively using the above plugin with Protractor for testing. So instead of controlling a browser, you control only some HTML elements on a page. Yeah, 8 months on version 5.4.2, because the version 6 has some problems :(. Let’s write another scenario where we type in … I recommend Cypress, with him is possible to do E2E and Unit tests. Cypress has been made specifically for developers and QA engineers, to help them get more done. However, it's a good day to try modern frameworks like webdriverio or codeceptjs! I trust Angular team, if they are still using this tool probably there are good reasons for keeping it. Just because they haven't updated it in a while doesn't mean still not the best framework for automation. Compare verified reviews from the IT community of Cypress vs. Selenium in Software Test Automation Cypress vs Selenium: Gartner Peer Insights 2020 Choose … One more feature why we not use protractor; Cypress replaces Protractor because it does all of these things and much more. Even better than selenium java. This information is available in this presentation I give on the topic. Therefore, the installation is quite short and no periodic updates of the drivers are needed. Unfortunately they are usually time consuming in creation and execution. Also, multi tab and multi browser scenarios are quite brittle. Well, that's a myth. The fact is that Angular is very popular, and Protractor is its official e2e test tool, so you can easily imagine why many people is using the repository issue board to ask things that are not bug related. The ability to step through your test makes writing tests easier. Protractor waits for Angular to finish rendering before taking any action on-page. Keep the tests deterministic. So async/await is coming. Protractor supports a wait command but with this, you need to be explicit about what you are waiting for every time instead of simply having the wait built into the commands. You can also just clone my demo repo here. Desired behavior: await-ing cypress chains yields the value of the chain (since the chain is a promise-like, it should work with await out of the box). Honestly I added this comment because I don't like that a project quality is judged by the its number of releases. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. iframes: This article explains how to work with iframes cypress.io/blog/2020/02/12/working... file uploads: How to work with file upload with Cypress github.com/cypress-io/cypress-exam... native events: Yes this is a big issue which they are actively working on github.com/cypress-io/cypress/issu... any other browser except Chrome: They have recently started supporting firefox docs.cypress.io/guides/guides/laun... xpath: Cypress has this beautiful concept called plugins and with that it's possible to extend the capabilities of cypress, one such example is using external node module for working with xpath, I personally used this and it works well npmjs.com/package/cypress-xpath. Vs code provides a way … Whatever it means. Do you want to become an Angular architect? Use Cypress server and request interception to control the returned data. Otherwise, it will follow the principle of creating the smoke test to make this happen for the top 5 use cases. Many teams are comparing Protractor and Cypress for their E2E testing. If there are important sections of the application’s logic that were notexecuted from the tests, then a new test should be added to ensure that part of our application … However, new features or protocol extensions won't be available. Most of the apps we write at Gorrion use sophisticated, modern web stacks based on React and Angular. This should cut the e2e execution time in half. Cypress showed that E2E tests should be easy to write and encourage developers to use it. These steps were: Design the testing strategy, define the top 5 use cases, create the smoke test, define the test data, implement the top 5 use cases and run the E2E tests on the CI pipeline. To do a fast recap: Yes I know, another todo app. If there are more contributors to protractor itself, we could make it stronger as a framework. Protractor. So project still faces stagnation. Now, the last step to actually get ANY benefit from all this work we need to have this automated as part of the delivery pipeline. With recent upgrades from protractor, I believe it is stable. I just checked if protractor is the official e2e test tool, and looks like it is, speaking of Angular 10. Chai.js. These steps were: Design the testing strategy, define the top 5 use cases, create the smoke test, define the test data, implement the top 5 use cases and run the E2E tests on the CI pipeline. The actual test is just calling the page object. When you run npm run e2e from the package.json, Angular takes the configuration from the angular.json under the e2e object. Selenium vs Cypress – A Top-Down View. We saw in this post why I started to prefer Cypress over Protractor and we went through 7 steps to introducing Cypress on your team. the spinner overlay to disappear. Cypress is built so it acts like a real user. In a private engagement, we can address this at the start of class - your team could choose or pivot between these two choices after class has already started. Open source. The indirect control of web elements with promises everywhere tends to drive design full of chained methods and loops. But in the end who cares, if eventually you talk to the last layer of the stack (protractor itself), which is pretty straight forward. However, nowadays, it doesn't feel so well. This post will leave all this behind and focus on a brighter future. Run the smoke test on every pull request build, Run the top 5 use case regression tests every day at noon and at midnight (if it takes longer than 15 minutes). An automatic end-to-end testing tool should also test like this or they will always be flaky. Now we come to some actual code! Cypress vs WebdriverIO. If you want to test with other browsers, like IE, Edge, Firefox, Safari, and any mobile browsers, TestCafe is a way better choice (given that it is browser agnostic). So yes, you can still execute tests in Protractor without the pain of maintaining Protractor code! This is also why Cypress recommends you. Why? Note: Webdriverio and codeceptjs can't be considered a 'modern framework', is only one more with less suport and feature. That is because a user understands the asynchronous nature of web applications and knows to wait and retry for a reasonable amount of time before he reports a problem. Let’s consider how simple it can be to get started with Cypress. Cypress.io Have you ever found yourself writing a lot of console log’s just to get some kind of vision on what is going on when the end-to-end tests are running? If you have been working with Angular for a while, I am sure you have been working with Protractor. Cypress showed that E2E tests should be easy to write and encourage developers to use it. At least senior JavaScript developer is required to prepare a good Protractor setup. Why? However, Selenium WebDriver was not updated for two years and now they are moving to 4.0. all the asynchronously fetched resources are ready and processed? Note, that this spec file doesn’t contain any Cypress dependencies to keep it framework agnostic and higher level of abstraction. 5. The protractor upgrade didn't arrive yet, true, but our code is much more readable and maintainable now . For third-party services, which we don’t control, it can be a good idea to stub them out if they are causing fragility in the dev environment. Cypress is an open source e2e test runner that is very efficient and give you a modern e2e testing experience. If your test runs and passes, congratulations on writing an e2e test with Cypress! Sure, totally possible. Home; Quick Start . Maintaining your tests must be part of your work IMO. Angular is still widely popular but the truth is that you don't need Protractor to test Angular application. Details. 5. Of course not, if you find that you easily code maintain more with 0 % flake and 100 % confidence then you can just expand to more use cases, but I have rarely seen this been the case for companies. You might mitigate this a bit with recording screenshots/videoes but even with this, the error message itself can leave you clueless. Cypress.io vs Protractor: e2e testing battle; What Does Cypress Mean for the Future? If you didn't have a chance to look into CodeceptJS, it's a good time to do so! In this post we will get started with Cypress and create our first e2e test for an example angular project. Thanks cap. Protractor. After a switch, each browser call should be wrapped with await keyword. They also offer the studio ($), so you can create the tests without writing it. Have fun doing this for every line. There is only one person working in spare time on this huge project. Of course, the same steps can be used here as I have never seen anything that has worked better at introducing stable and useful end-to-end tests fast. Scaffolding a projectScaffolding an Angular project using ng new is a huge time saver. End to End (e2e) – Angular Testing – Protractor vs Cypress As the applications grows, the manual testing becomes more and more complex. When you have this setup, you should have an e2e test project beside your app project: The Cypress documentation is ridiculously good so I recommend you just read that for the Cypress fundamentals. In this post, we will take a look at what Cypress is, why our team chose it, and things you may want to consider when evaluating it for your own projects. The web has changed, the JavaScript ecosystem has changed, the Selenium has changed, but Protractor didn't. You spend most of the time not writing tests but fighting web elements. Protractor is almost ready to switch to this version but this still a big issue to end-users. Switching to Cypress from Protractor in Less Than 30 Seconds. These additions make querying for elements much easier. Yes, thank you! Create your e2e tests with Cypress! This was also taken from the selenium-webdriver library. Cypress has a better way to handle with Custom cypress.io/blog/2019/01/03/stop-us... Also, Cypress is ever evolving and they are going places to reach audience and gather feedback. It was the most popular language on GitHub in 2017. Should you rewrite your tests to it? Maintaining E2E tests can become a hard job quickly because it is interacting with a real DOM. When pages begin to transition, Cypress will pause command execution until the subsequent page is fully loaded. Cypress is an all inclusive one-stop solution for all your testing requirements. If it eg. As you write more and more end-to-end tests, you will find yourself wondering - do I need to write more tests? DEV Community – A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers. 4. Just FYI, not that it changes anything you've written, but I thought it was an interesting move on their part. All the unit tests can pass but if there, eg. Nowadays, it is no use to rewrite those tests in Protractor as its future is not clear. If you haven’t heard of Cypress yet, I’m sure you will soon. Using a tree method, I delete the entire e2e directory. Although Protractor is not a bad tool, there are more modern E2E testing tools such as Cypress which makes writing tests and debugging them a much nicer experience.

With Cypress, you can write E2E tests with a well-developed tooling.
Cypress does not need browser drivers like Selenium, because the code is executed directly as Javascript in the browser. If you find it very easy to do these E2E tests and you feel you can handle more, feel free to expand your suite to more than just top 5 use cases. This makes it very easy to trace what has been run in the test and helps fix problems with a broken test. npm install @nrwl/cypress --D npm install @nrwl/workspace --D Do the following changes to the angular.json. The cypress folder is where we will be writing our tests. We will look at the flaws in Protractor and how Cypress is fixing them as well as looking into the 7 steps to Cypress e2e testing success. The reason 2 to 5 isn't a argument, only the 1 is a argument to why don't use protractor. I assume - yes, Protractor will work, as Selenium team support legacy implementations. which has very good community support, unlike many new tools (at least for now). Also, you need to implement this by your self as well. Missing even one await will lead to broken and unpredictable tests. Hence, automated e2e tests are more important than ever. I do not agree with every point you made against Protractor, however, the other frameworks mentioned is not solid as such and new to the market as well. Topic: Protractor VS Cypress, or front end e2e testing 2019 Speaker: Krasnikov Ievgenii - JS Engineer, Daxx Kharkiv. More stable than classes/elements selection and tell the developers that this is used in e2e tests. Not more complicated than Java+Selenium stack though. But then there are alternatives to Page Objects like SerenityJs's Screenplay Pattern, again PO Pattern makes things more complex. For web developers, we are open sourcing a very powerful E2E tool called Cypress that is capable of giving your confidence that the app is going to work. Let’s look at how we can start using Cypress to test our Angular app. Here is my totally opinionated list of the biggest problems with Protractor: Let’s go through each of them and see why this is. cypress-io/cypress-realworld-app or RWA is a full stack example application that demonstrates best practices and scalable strategies with Cypress in practical and realistic scenarios. Reset the state before each test run. This also has the benefit of making the spec code more clean as well as ensuring separation of concerns. In any framework it will create a bad design like this. So instead of relying on Angular to synchronize components by some magic, it is more reliable to use explicit Selenium waits like browser.wait(EC.visibilityOf($('#abc')), 5000); Today Cypress.io takes popularity. You can do some workarounds like this, to avoid doing all the console logs yourself, but you are still limited to only getting the browser events and not every single command with the desired information in the console. In short, my recommended approach here is: Now, for people who are new to automatic end-to-end testing, only doing top 5 use cases might not seem as enough. Future posts will expound upon how my team uses Cypress and technicals around using Cypress. Nightwatchjs vs Protractor: ... Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. But not today. Always use an e2e-* id or data-e2e attribute for selecting elements. But don’t lie to yourself, only do this if you actually have managed to run the top 5 use cases with easy maintenance and big value for money. Protractor is basically used for big enterprise projects and Cypress is basically used for small web apps. But this is a result of overcomplicated design in Protractor. 2. If you’re already using Angular, there’s a bunch of guides out there that will help you get started with Protractor – and I intend to provide more information in future posts. Picking a tool by their popularity is a bad idea at first. Templates let you quickly answer FAQs or store snippets for re-use. Cypress even knows how fast an element is animating and will wait for it to stop! Cypress.io vs Protractor: e2e testing battle by@kobvel Cypress.io vs Protractor: e2e testing battle Originally published by Mykhailo Churilov (Mikki Kobvel) on September 28th 2017 22,202 reads All the above other than WebDriverIO are not based on Selenium which is a good thing. End e2e testing battle ; what does Cypress Mean for the JavaScript world e2e... The official e2e test with Cypress and technicals around using Cypress discussed next switching to Cypress were with. Offer the studio ( $ ), so it can be more expensive than rewriting all tests from!... Cypress were built with Selenium e.g occur unless the timeout is set too low that and it is a popular. ) it is less and less stable as if a component has finished rendering or not configuration. Cypress contains meaningful error messages that contain information about which element failed modern e2e testing vscode... Top of Selenium, which makes it less complicated to deal with asynchronous.... That as an alternative webdriver implementation in JavaScript and it is a result of overcomplicated in. Problems for you bundled some sort of assertion library e.g complicated to deal with asynchronous code cypress e2e vs protractor... Version will be writing our tests full suite at noon and midnight to control the server by the! The option to use it on a page Protractor tests can be used selecting... For developers and QA engineers, to show and being confused from the angular.json under the e2e tests we.... Backwards compatible but it does n't stand a test runner that is very and... Take and save a screenshot when it fails finished rendering or not introduces the to. Save a screenshot when it has failed on the CI will this really cause problems you! Bet some of you might mitigate this a bit with recording screenshots/videoes but even with this, the installation binaries... Superb choice if you still use it, or front end e2e testing battle ; what Cypress! A huge time saver introduce anything huge in codebase, as we are actively the! This huge project and if you already use it on a page my-awesome-app and the e2e instead... Of what Protractor tests can pass but if there are several different tools that I have been with! The studio ( $ ), so engineers experienced with Java can easily go to Protractor itself, we make... Them in the e2e Protractor tests can be backwards compatible cypress e2e vs protractor it not! Do so now ) break if you have written e2e tests can be run you most! As an alternative but do n't use Protractor when version 6 is released answer! Can easily go to their website cypress.io or data-e2e attribute for selecting elements in the end detail on! After the test and helps fix problems with a broken test testing native mobile apps with appium tool... Tools like Cypress, with him is possible to do e2e testing ;... Setup in my article testing vscode extensions with Cypress on this huge project is. -- addCypressTestScripts two handy npm scripts were added to make this happen for the JavaScript ecosystem has,. Dropping support of control flow in version 4 not actively developed as well: always up... A place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers scenarios! For NodeJS so, the Selenium has changed, the question is: it! Makes it less complicated to deal with asynchronous code | 3 Answers Oldest... Leave all this behind and focus on a production project run npm run e2e from the same conditions! Bad idea at first we could make it stronger as a substitute of Protractor provides a nice Promise-based on! That perhaps are tested too much functions needed to write unit and e2e tests a. Give on the CI to investigate why an e2e test with Cypress a bit different with the above plugin cypress e2e vs protractor...